I really do hope settlement layouts is kept as small as possible and feel like something from the period, bigger is not always better. Some defense upgrades could be a simple moat or dirt ditch that protects the village with a single bridge to defend it or a small ring wall. It would also be nice if minor settlements were land battles like in Warhammer where the defenses can be upgraded over time maybe at tier 3. There definitely should be some unique settlements like Tintagel Fortress, Jorvik, Bamburgh, and some of the crazy Pict and Irish iron age stone forts like Dún Sebuirge. It might be a challenge to make these style sieges interesting, but to pull this period off I think CA needs to make the settlements similar to what the Viking Conquest team did, just scaled appropriately for unit combat. You would still have ladders and battering rams, but the fortified settlements would act more like unique battle maps with choke points, bridges, causeways, and mazes so the few can hold off many. I really do hope CA does not include artillery, it just doesn't feel right for the period and I hated armies having onagers in field battles in Age of Charlemagne. Looking at some of the settlement possibilities for the period I hope CA takes the historical approach with settlements being smaller and unique to the culture. What the heck is CA going to do with sieges in Thrones of Britannia? Are we going to get more of the same behemoth settlement types with onagers to lob rocks like in Age of Charlemagne or is CA going to go for more authentic period siege battles? What we do know this far is CA has confirmed that there will indeed be new settlements in Thrones of Britannia. 2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia.844 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.Trying to find something in the Third_Age_ folder but, since it was non-existant, didn't find them. Third Age folder, I suffered an amount of crashes simply due to the files, according to the log, On the other hand, when I had renamed my folder from the Third_Age_Total_War to a proper However, in my former Imladris DaC campaign, I suffered 0 crashes caused by AI turns despite Vale of Anduin surviving till end of the game. Didn't crash every battle but somewhat around 6/10 battles fought.ĭuring my current Umbar DaC campaign, the Vale of Anduin kept crashing my game untill I surrendered their regions, then it was all easy peasy lemon squeezy again. Zooming in during sieges, which can already be laggy due to the AI sending a ton of troops up a single siege tower, you just overload the game and the game doesn't use more then 2GB of RAM (regardless of how many you have).Īlso, I got persistent crashes in vanilla TATW when I played Gondor and fought Harad on a map with water. Is it just random when you're on campaign map? So.great log and all but.what actually crashes your game?
0 kommentar(er)
